论文部分内容阅读
目的研究和分析静脉血与末梢血采集应用于血常规检验中的效果。方法挑选血常规检验者88例作为研究对象,通过电脑随机进行分组,分为对照组与观察组,各44例。研究组实施静脉血采集血常规检验,观察组实施末梢血采集血常规检验。对比、分析两组血液样本血常规检测的结果以及抗凝后不同时间点的检测结果。结果观察组Hb、RBC、WBC、PLT水平等,均显著优于对照组,组间差异显著具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论静脉血与末梢血采集应用于血常规检验之后,其检测结果有明显差异,但静脉血采集应用于血常规检验的效果更好,值得临床应用推广。
Objective To study and analyze the effect of venous and peripheral blood collection in blood routine test. Methods Totally 88 blood test subjects were selected as study subjects and randomly divided into control group and observation group, 44 cases in each group. The study group carried out venous blood collection routine blood test, observation group implemented peripheral blood collection blood routine test. The results of blood routine tests and blood test results at different time points after anticoagulation were compared between the two groups. Results The levels of Hb, RBC, WBC and PLT in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group. There was significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). Conclusion The results of venous blood collection and peripheral blood collection after blood routine test are obviously different, but venous blood collection is better for blood test and worthy of clinical application.