论文部分内容阅读
在股市,“投资有风险,入市须谨慎”的善意提醒,彰显了证券交易的人性化,证券市场也很少发生股民与提供中介交易的证券交易所产生纠纷的现象。而在艺术品拍卖市场,因拍品瑕疵引发的纠纷诉讼却屡见报端。同样是履行中介职能,拍卖行却因《拍卖法》第61条的瑕疵不担保声明而成为众矢之的。拍卖人是否可以同样主张“拍卖有风险,竞买须谨慎”呢?对此,本刊特邀法学专家、中拍协法律咨询委员会主任田涛教授,从法理学的角度为您分析——
In the stock market, “the risk of investment, the market must be cautious,” the goodwill reminder, highlighting the humane securities transactions, the stock market is also rare occurrence of stock investors and provide intermediary transactions, the stock exchange disputes. In the art auction market, disputes over litigation caused by flaws in the auction are often reported. The same is the performance of intermediary functions, the auction house because of “Auction Law” Article 61 flaw does not guarantee a target. Auctioneer whether the same can be claimed "In this regard, the journal invited experts in law, Professor Association of Legal Consultative Committee, Professor Tian Tao, from the jurisprudence point of view for your analysis -