在1933-1934年的京海派论争中,论争一方关键当事人沈从文近四十天的缺席使“论争”实际上成为有论无争。但直接导致沈从文不再讨论京派、海派问题并最终导致京海派论争不了了之的,是此时突然爆出的“何徐创作问题”风波。受此一风波的影响,有关京派、海派的论争与言说,实际成了一场界线模糊的乱战。从胡适、鲁迅等对这场风波的反应来看,“何徐创作问题”风波突显出了京派海派、左派右派问题的复杂性和混沌性,直接导致了京海派论争的终结。 In the 1933-1934 Beijing-Shanghai argument, the absence of nearly a dozen days of Shen Congwen, the key party to the controversial party, made “controversy” virtually in vain. However, Shen Congwen directly led to no longer discuss the Beijing school, the Shanghai issue and eventually led to Beijing-Shanghai school can not be argued for the argument, this time suddenly burst into “Xu Xu creation problems ” storm. Influenced by this storm, the controversy and rhetoric about the Beijing faction and the Shanghai faction actually turned out to be a vague conflagration. From the responses of Hu Shih and Lu Xun to the storm, the “He Xu Creation Issue” storm highlighted the complexity and chaos of the Beijing School Shanghai School and the Left Left School, which directly led to the end of the debate over the Beijing-Shanghai School.