何以实行一案四审?是增加诉累,还是浪费司法资源、增加司法成本?抑或法官作秀?非也。纯粹从审级和司法程序上讲,我国实行二审终审制。但不从审级的角度,仅从探求终极正义来说,笔者更信奉一案四审。一审事实,谓之鞫。事实就其外延讲,乃是事物之本源,就其内涵讲,即特定的当事人在特定的时空范围内就特定的利益而发生的一系列活动。事实是最客观的。 Why the Fourth Trial in a Case? Is there more litigation, or is it a waste of judicial resources, an increase of the judicial cost? Or is the judge showing off? Purely from the trial level and judicial procedure, our country implements the second instance final trial system. But not from the perspective of the trial level, only from the search for ultimate justice, I believe in a case of the fourth trial. The facts of the first instance, that of 鞫. The fact that its extension is the source of things is its connotation, that is, a series of activities that a particular party takes in a particular interest within a specific space-time. The facts are the most objective.