论文部分内容阅读
在加快建立社会主义市场经济体制的过程中,我国部分国有企业正进行股份制改造,这是深化企业内部改革,转换经营机制,建立有中国特色的现代企业制度的一项有益的探索。国有企业改制后要不要设立党组织?要不要发挥党组织的政治核心作用?在这些根本问题上有些人存在着一些模糊认识,归纳起来有三种:(1)“没有必要”论。这一观点认为国有股份制企业不需要设立党的工作机构,不需要发挥党组织的政治核心作用。理由是,发达国家企业没有党组织,生产力照样发达,因而我们也可以不要。他们还认为建立现代企业制度,改国有企业为股份制企业是资本主义的一套,与中国共产党的性质、宗旨是完全不相符的,因而国有股份制企业没必要设立党组织政治工作机构。(2)“无关紧要”论。持这一观点的人认为国有股份制企业即使设立了党的工作机构,也无法发挥作
In speeding up the establishment of a socialist market economic system, some state-owned enterprises in our country are carrying out shareholding system reform. This is a useful exploration of deepening the internal reform of enterprises, transforming the operating mechanism and establishing a modern enterprise system with Chinese characteristics. Whether or not to establish the party organization after the reform of the state-owned enterprises? Whether to play the political core role of the party organizations? Some people have some vague understanding of these fundamental issues. There are three ways to sum up: (1) “no need” theory. This view argues that state-owned joint-stock enterprises do not need to establish a working body for the party and do not need to play the political core role of the party organization. The reason is that enterprises in developed countries do not have a party organization and productivity is still developed, so we can not. They also believe that establishing a modern enterprise system and changing state-owned enterprises into joint-stock enterprises is a set of capitalism totally incompatible with the nature and purpose of the Chinese Communist Party. Therefore, it is not necessary for state-owned joint-stock enterprises to set up political work organizations for party organizations. (2) “irrelevant ” theory. Those who hold this view think that even if the state-owned joint-stock enterprises set up the working bodies of the party, they will not be able to play