编辑与作者,同是办报的主体力量,可谓目标完全一致。但正如一切事物都是在充满矛盾的运动中发展的一样,他们之间也存有矛盾。其表现,大体有这样几个方面: 一如对于稿件的改动,编者与作者的意见可能不一致或不尽一致。一篇来稿,不经编辑做任何改动即原封不动见报发表的,实在是太少了。绝大多数都要或多或少做些改动,有的,则须动“大手术”。对于不很成熟的作者,你做何改动,他不大在乎。而对于那些成名作者,似不那么简单。他们也重视自己的稿件能否见报,但更看重见报的质量。况且他们之中确有一些水平高于编辑一筹,如此,编辑的某些改动就有可能得不到作者的认同。有人碍于情面嘴上不说,但不等于没有意见。 Editor and author, with the main force of the newspaper, can be described as exactly the same goal. But just as everything is developed in a paradoxical movement, there are contradictions between them. Its performance, in general, has several aspects: Just as the manuscript changes, the views of the editor and the author may be inconsistent or inconsistent. A manuscript, without any editorial changes to be published immediately, it is too little. Most of them have to make more or less some changes, and some, you have to move “major surgery.” He did not care much about what you did for a less mature author. For those who fame, it seems not so simple. They also value their papers can see the newspaper, but more emphasis on the quality of the newspaper. Moreover, some of them do have a higher level than editors, so some editorial changes may not get the author’s approval. Some people do not say because of feelings, but does not mean no comment.