论文部分内容阅读
纪实摘要案情初现:1993年3月9日,16岁的少女罗斯和同学去明纳多大峡谷春游。3月10日上午,罗斯和同学在丛林中走散,然后失踪。5天后,在人迹罕至的悬崖下,警方发现了罗斯的尸体。索拉市警方经过现场勘测后得出结论:罗斯是在迷路之后失足掉下悬崖的。罗斯的父亲不相信此结论。在他的恳求下,23岁的刑警迈克尔勘测了现场。他指出4个疑点:第一,悬崖上方是片松软的泥地,罗斯穿的是高跟鞋。如果罗斯是从上面摔下,必定会在泥地上留下高跟鞋的印记。然而,泥地没有脚印。第二,悬崖上有茂密的草木,如果罗斯从悬崖上不慎滑落下来,出于求生的本
Documentary Summary Case Study: March 9, 1993, 16-year-old girl Rose and her classmates went to the Minneapolis Spring Festival. On the morning of March 10, Rose and his classmates were scattered in the jungle and then disappeared. Five days later, on the brink of inhumanity, the police uncovered Rose’s body. Sola police after field investigation concluded: Rose is lost after the lost cliff. Rose’s father does not believe this conclusion. At his plea, 23-year-old criminal police Michael surveyed the scene. He pointed out four doubts: first, the cliff above the piece of soft mud, Rose wearing high heels. If Rose is falling from above, it is bound to leave the impression of high heels in the mud. However, there is no footprint on the mud. Second, the cliffs are dense vegetation, Rose Rose accidentally slipped from the cliff, out of the survival of this