论文部分内容阅读
导言程序正义应作为构建性的要素被整合入程序正义理论。有关的规范性理论也用了程序概念的若干不同功能之一即:限定性程序正义作用。本文主要论点是如果我们不对公正加以额外的支持性的论据的话,那么限定性程序正义的应用是有限的,例如:程序的性质问题。这篇文章包括对应用的术语的一般性论述(第一部分);以及正义理论中程序正义作用的发挥,并列出两个突出的例子:合同关系和互交理论(第二部分):最后文章指出当代正义理论存在的不足(文章第三部分)
Introduction Procedural justice should be incorporated as a constructive element into procedural justice theory. The relevant normative theory also uses one of several different functions of the concept of procedure namely the role of limited procedural justice. The main argument in this paper is that limited application of the procedural justice is limited if we do not provide any additional support for fairness, such as the nature of the procedure. This article includes a general discussion of the terminology used in the application (Part 1); and the role of procedural justice in the theory of justice, with two prominent examples: the theory of contractual relations and reciprocity (Part 2): the last article Pointed out that there is a lack of contemporary theory of justice (the third part of the article)