准确鉴别肝内、外胆汁郁积甚为重要,因二者治疗不同。非侵入性诊断技术超声波(US)、CT、~(99m)锝-HIDA和~(99m)锝-PIPIDA胆道扫描(NMBS)对病人有利,且较之临床判断敏感性和特异性更高,与侵入性肝胆管造影同样敏感和特异。本研究以根据病史、体检、常规血液检查等确定的临床评价(CE)和所得US、CT及NMBS资料进行比较。对象:成年患者61人,男59例,女2例。有11例因资料不全被除外。资料完整者50例作CE和至少二 Accurate identification of intrahepatic cholestasis is very important, because the two treatment is different. Non-invasive diagnostic techniques US, CT, 99m Tc-HIDA and 99m Tc-PIPIDA biliary tract scan (NMBS) are beneficial to patients and more sensitive and specific than clinical judgment, Invasive cholangiopancreatography is equally sensitive and specific. In this study, the clinical evaluation (CE) and the obtained US, CT and NMBS data were compared based on medical history, physical examination, routine blood tests and the like. Subjects: 61 adult patients, 59 males and 2 females. Eleven cases were excluded due to incomplete information. Data complete 50 cases for CE and at least two