“清承明制”固为定论,然而清代相对于明代有政制方面的创新,亦无可否认,而且其政制创新基本上底定于康熙一朝。康熙在平定郑氏据台割据势力的次年,即1684年,实施全面解除海禁的政策;再在1700年创始八旗“生息银两”制度,即政府低息贷款于满洲八旗和汉军八旗人员从事经营活动,并将之首先推广于中日长崎洋铜贸易的领域。康熙此两项举措的动机,在很大程度上源自钱制改革,以解决满清建国以来持续恶化的钱制危机。但是在与钱制危机同样严峻的河、漕两大内政困境问题上,却完全不见康熙有以海上交通寻求解决之途的任何决策动向的踪影。本文拟在档案史料的基础上,兼及具体人和事两方面,追踪康熙在河、漕两大内政困境问题上的立场和处置方式,探析漕粮海运未能在康熙朝实现的原因。 “Qing Cheng Ming system,” solid as a conclusion, however, compared with the Qing Dynasty, there is no denying the innovation of the political system in the Ming Dynasty, and its political innovation basically basically set Kangxi. In 1784, Emperor Kangxi, in 1784, initiated the policy of lifting the ban on sea banning in the following year, which was the following year that Ping Cheng set foot in the air by Zheng Taishin. In 1700, Personnel engaged in business activities, and will be the first to promote the Sino-Japanese Nagasaki foreign trade in the field of copper. The motive of these two measures by Emperor Kangxi originated in large part from the reform of the money system in order to solve the deteriorating crisis of the money system that has deteriorated since the founding of the People’s Republic. However, on the same two major internal difficulties as the crisis of money system, there is absolutely no trace of any decision-making direction of Kang Xi seeking to solve the problem by maritime traffic. This article intends to trace the position and disposal of Kangxi on the two dilemmas of internal affairs of the river and Caoji, and on the basis of the historical data of the archives and the specific people and events, and analyze the reason why the grain and water transportation of Grain and Grain failed to be realized in Kangxi Dynasty.