论文部分内容阅读
1列子是否真有其人,历史上一直存在着争议。否定者以历来被当作信史的《史记》没有记载列子只言片字而认为他是后人虚构出来的一位人物。肯定者则认为:虽然《史记》不曾记载列子,但另外一些重要的文献比如《战国策》《吕氏春秋》却有关于他的记载,道家重要代表人物庄子也曾多次在文章中提及列子,并且根据这些记载,整理出了列子的基本生平。列子,本名列御寇,战国早期郑国人,早于庄子,今郑州圃田乡人。据说列子一生
Whether there are real people in the list, there has always been controversy in history. The historian, who has always been regarded as the history of the history of the letter of the negation, has no account of the epithet Liezi, who is considered a poster figure by his descendants. The affirmative argues that although Records of the Historian did not record Liezi, other important documents such as “Warring States Policy” and “Spring and Autumn Annals” contain records about him. Zhuang Zi, an important representative of Taoism, has also repeatedly mentioned in the article Liezi, and according to these records, sorted out the basic life Liezi. Liezi, the real name of the Kou Kou, early Warring States Zheng people, as early as Chuang Tzu, Tian Zhen today nursery. It is said that Liezi life