《法学研究》2007年第6期刊登池漫郊“缺员仲裁的合法性”一文后,缺员仲裁迅速窜升为我国法学界、仲裁界研究的热点问题,学者们连篇累牍的发表文章,一边倒地肯定缺员仲裁具有合法性,阐述缺员仲裁在提高仲裁效率方面的重要作用,甚至断言对缺员裁决“予以承认和执行是仲裁制度发展的趋势”。〔1〕与学者们溢美讴歌缺员仲裁相反,各国 After the publication of the article entitled “The Legality of Missing Arbitration” published in Manchuria, Journal of Legal Science (2007), the absence of arbitration rapidly rose to become a hot issue in the study of law and arbitration in China. , Affirming the lack of arbitration arbitrarily on the one hand legitimacy, explain the lack of arbitration in improving the efficiency of arbitration, an important role, and even asserted that the lack of arbitration award, “the recognition and enforcement of the arbitration system is the development trend.” 〔1〕 Contrary to the scholars’ merit-truncated absence of arbitration, all countries