论文部分内容阅读
目的探索结构式团体辅导(团辅)对不同依恋类型大一新生人际问题改善的效果,为改善大一新生人际问题提供参考。方法选取杭州某大学95名大一新生分为实验组(49名)和对照组(46名)。实验组被试接受连续10周,每周2 h的结构式团辅,对照组不接受任何处理。在团辅前分别对2组被试施测关系问卷(RQ)和人际问题量表(IIP-32),团辅结束后对2组被试施测人际问题量表(IIP-32)和团体治疗疗效因子问卷(GTFQ)。结果不同依恋类型大一新生人际问题总分差异有统计学意义(F=6.185,P<0.01);实验组害怕型依恋大一新生团辅后人际问题总分低于团辅前(t=2.942,P<0.05),而对照组差异无统计学意义(t=-0.188,P>0.05)。结构式团辅对害怕型依恋个体的人际问题干预后的疗效因子得分最高为存在意识,为(21.29±4.23)分。结论结构式团辅对害怕型依恋大一新生人际问题的干预具有较好的效果。
Objective To explore the effect of structural group counseling (TUX) on improving interpersonal problems of freshmen and adolescents with different attachment styles, and to provide references for improving interpersonal problems of freshmen. Methods Ninety - five freshmen from a university in Hangzhou were divided into experimental group (49) and control group (46). The experimental group was accepted for 10 weeks, 2 h per week structural group auxiliary, the control group did not receive any treatment. Before the regiment, the two groups were tested on questionnaires (RQ) and interpersonal problems scale (IIP-32). After the group regimen was completed, the two groups of interpersonal questionnaires (IIP-32) Therapeutic efficacy factor questionnaire (GTFQ). Results The total scores of interpersonal problems of freshmen in different attachment styles were significantly different (F = 6.185, P <0.01). The scores of interpersonal problems in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the group supplements (t = 2.942 , P <0.05), while there was no significant difference in the control group (t = -0.188, P> 0.05). The results showed that the score of efficacy factor after intervening in interpersonal problems of the fear-typed attachment individuals was the highest (21.29 ± 4.23). Conclusion The results of structural group counseling intervene in interpersonal problems of fearful attachment freshman year have a good effect.