论文部分内容阅读
相关实证研究显示,长期以来认为知识私有产权是创新的前提条件的定见并不成立。创新的灵感和动机来自对新奇事物和实际问题的追逐,以及自由、平等的协作环境的促进。与定见相反,知识私有的产权秩序与创新的内在要求存在尖锐对立。代表资本利润最大化的前者将不可避免地破坏自由、平等协作的创新精神和环境,后者不可避免地要求相对公平的分配制度和伦理关系。因此成功的创新型企业都要小心地避开资本的控制,在内部抑制知识私有。现代大创新对集体协作的要求已经到了新的高度,企业的规模相应地扩大直至国家主持;青蒿素抗疟药物的研发,就是在社会主义制度下探索的一条新路。
Relevant empirical studies show that the opinion that privately owned intellectual property has long been a precondition for innovation does not hold. Innovative inspiration and motivation comes from the chase of novelty and practical issues, as well as the promotion of a free and equal collaborative environment. Contrary to what we see, there is a sharp contrast between the proprietary order of knowledge and the inherent requirements of innovation. The former, which represents the maximization of capital profits, will inevitably undermine the innovative spirit and environment of free and equal cooperation. The latter inevitably demand a relatively fair distribution system and ethical relations. Therefore, successful and innovative enterprises should be careful to avoid the control of capital, internally inhibit the private ownership of knowledge. The demand of modern big innovation for collective cooperation has reached a new height. The scale of enterprises has been expanded correspondingly to that of the state. The development of artemisinin anti-malarial drugs is a new road explored under the socialist system.