论文部分内容阅读
2010年9月14日生效的《最高人民法院关于审理劳动争议案件适用法律若干问题的解释(三)》(以下简称司法解释三)第一条规定,“劳动者以用人单位未为其办理社会保险手续,且社会保险经办机构不能补办导致其无法享受社会保险待遇为由,要求用人单位赔偿损失而发生争议的,人民法院应予受理。”司法实践中已经明确因用人单位欠缴、拒缴社会保险费或因缴费年限、缴费基数等发生争议的不再属于劳动争议的受案范围,法院应当告知当事人向
The Interpretation of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Labor Disputes (III) (hereinafter referred to as “Judicial Interpretation III”) which entered into force on September 14, 2010 According to the first article of the Judicial Interpretation III, “the laborer does not handle the matter with the employer Social insurance procedures, and social insurance agencies can not be re-cited as the reason they can not enjoy the social insurance benefits, requiring the employer to compensate for the loss of the dispute, the people’s court should be admissible. ”Judicial practice has been clearly due to employers owed , Refusing to pay social insurance premiums, or disputes over the payment period, payment base, etc. no longer belong to the scope of the labor dispute, the court shall inform the parties