在“无辜不受定罪”的法律价值取向下,“排除合理怀疑”作为英美法系国家普遍认同的证明标准,是保障人权和现代法治社会提出的必然要求。法官在司法实践中,是否应当向陪审团指示“排除合法怀疑”的内容一直存在很大争议,法院和检察院之间,原审法院与上诉法院之间意见不一。本文简要论述一下“合理怀疑”(Reasonable Doubt)的内涵。 Under the legal value of “innocence without conviction ”, “excluding reasonable doubt” as the common standard of proof in Anglo-American legal system countries is the inevitable requirement of protecting human rights and modern law-based society. Judges in judicial practice should be instructed to the jury whether the content of “excluding legal doubt” has been very controversial. There is disagreement between the court and the procuratorate, and between the trial court and the court of appeals. This article briefly discusses the meaning of “Reasonable Doubt.”