论文部分内容阅读
苏格拉底式的心灵探究充斥着种种不经之论和不当的概念预设,滋生了僵硬、枯寂的心灵观,妨害了对心灵之本质的合理说明。戴维森认为只有变革心灵认知方法,赋予心灵以异常性,树立动态而富有弹性的新型心灵观,使之一致和融贯于现有的自然科学知识整体,镜喻思维才有望打破,心灵在物理世界中的地位才能得到妥善安置。面对异常一元论所陷入的类型副现象论的责难,戴维森强调他那反形而上学立场没有被很好地领会,以至于其四对区分被忽视,即事件的形而上学和认识论区分与事件个例和事件类型区分;因果规律和因果规则区分以及高阶属性对低阶属性的本体论依赖与因果依赖区分,结果造成了无谓的语词争论。
Socratic exploration of the soul is full of all kinds of presuppositions of improper and inappropriate presuppositions that have inflicted a rigid and withered spiritual outlook that hinders the rational interpretation of the essence of the mind. Davidson believes that only by changing the cognitive methods of the mind, giving the mind abnormality, establishing a dynamic and flexible new mind, making it consistent and coherent throughout the existing knowledge of the natural sciences, the metaphorical thinking is expected to break, The status in the world can be properly settled. In the face of the blame for the type-side phenomenology caught in abnormal monism, Davidson emphasized that his anti-metaphysical position was not well understood, that his four distinctions were neglected, that is, the metaphysics and epistemological distinction of events and events and events Type distinction; causal and causal rules and high-order attributes of low-level attribute ontology dependence and causal dependence of distinction, the result of unnecessary word controversy.