论文部分内容阅读
司法实践中,检察机关基本上都将犯罪嫌疑人在党的纪检部门采取“双规”措施期间的如实交待认定为自首。犯罪嫌疑人“双规”期间的如实交待能否认定为自首,判断的标准应是其交待的行为是否符合自首成立的条件以及自首制度的立法本意。只有严格区分“双规”期间交待的不同情形,才能准确做出自首认定。
In judicial practice, procuratorial organs basically confessed to the surrender of suspects during the “double regulatory” measures taken by the discipline inspection departments of the party. Whether the criminal suspect’s “double rule” can be regarded as surrender truthfully should be regarded as the standard of judging whether the behavior confessed meets the conditions of establishing the surrender and the legislative intent of the surrender system. Only by strictly distinguishing between the different situations confronted by the “double regulations” can we make an accurate surrender.