论文部分内容阅读
将香港、澳门两个特别行政区违宪审查制度的产生背景,全国人大常委会以及特别行政区法院在违宪审查中所扮演的角色与内地违宪审查制度进行比较,可以得出的重要启示是,在内地,健全和完善违宪审查制度,必须十分注意诸多历史背景,特别是要注意中国共产党一党执政和实行人民代表大会制度这两个历史和现实的政治因素。在可以预期的情形下,由全国人大常委会在违宪审查中发挥主导作用是可行和必要的,在宪法体制内适当地发挥人民法院在违宪审查中的主观能动性,也是一种发展趋势。内地违宪审查制度的重要进展,正在等待一种机缘。
The important revelation we can draw from comparing the background of the constitutional review system of the two special administrative regions of Hong Kong and Macao, the role played by the NPC Standing Committee and the courts of the special administrative regions in unconstitutional review, is that in the Mainland, To improve and perfect the constitutional review system, we must pay great attention to many historical backgrounds, especially the two historical and realistic political factors that should be paid attention to when the CPC takes power and implemented the system of the people’s congress. Under the expected circumstances, it is feasible and necessary for the NPCSC to play a leading role in unconstitutional review. It is also a development trend that the People’s Court should exercise its subjective initiative in unconstitutional review within the constitutional system. The mainland’s constitutional review system is an important progress, is waiting for a chance.