论文部分内容阅读
针对学界有关存在论差异开端的争议,马里翁区分了存在论差异的三种内涵:两种不同存在者及其存在方式之间的差异,以及存在与存在者之间的差异。在此区分的基础上,马里翁提出,《存在与时间》论及的是前两种差异,对第三种只作了形式上的勾勒。但是马里翁没有看到,海德格尔有关“上手状态”与“在手状态”的区分可以视作存在论差异的思想原型,因此存在论差异的思想已经展开。“上手状态”与“在手状态”的区分是通过一种指引联络的“扰乱”而引入的。通过重新审视与追问此“扰乱”的可能性,我们将对存在论差异的“开端”及其思想实情,获得新的理解视野。
In response to the controversy over the beginning of the difference in ontology in academia, Marion distinguishes three kinds of connotations of ontological differences: the differences between two different beings and their ways of existence, and the differences between being and being. On the basis of this distinction, Marion proposed that “the existence and the time” dealt with the first two kinds of differences and the third one only made the formal outline. However, Marion did not see that Heidegger’s distinction between “hand status ” and “hand status ” can be regarded as the ideological prototype of the ontological differences, so the idea of the ontological difference has been launched. The distinction between “getting started” and “in hand” is introduced through a “jammer” that directs contact. By reexamining and questioning the possibility of this “disruption,” we will gain a new perspective of understanding about the “beginning” of the ontological differences and its actual situation.