论文部分内容阅读
米切尔·安·霍丽(Michael Ann Holly),先后在纽约、日内瓦等地大学任历史与美术史教师,本文译自她的专著《帕诺夫斯基与美术史基础》(康奈尔大学出版社,1984年)的第二章《帕诺夫斯基与沃尔夫林》的一部分,作者从帕诺夫斯基美术史方法出发,敏锐地抓住了沃尔夫林的关键问题——形式与风格的来源,分析了沃尔夫林方法论的哲学背景,并力图证明沃尔夫林的形式主义决非孤立的形式分析,而是探索形式演变的自身规律,他并没有否定风格与文化的联系,而是没有探讨解释这种联系的手段。在实证主义背景下,他只关心可由经验证实的视觉分析方式。
Michael Ann Holly, a history and art history teacher at universities such as New York and Geneva, translates from her monograph “Panovsky and the Foundations of Art History” (Cornell University Press, 1984), chapter two, “Parthenovsky and Wolflin” part, the author starting from the method of art history of Panovsky, keen to grasp the key issues of Wolfin - The source of form and style, analyzes the philosophical background of Wolfin’s methodology and seeks to prove that Wolflin’s formalism is by no means an isolated formal analysis, but to explore its own law of formal evolution, he does not have a negative style But not the means to explain this connection. In the positivist context, he is concerned only with empirically proven methods of visual analysis.