《孔子家語》的成書過程和真僞問題,歷代學者争論不休,疑之者多以爲王肅爲了駁倒鄭玄之學,假借孔子的名義,僞造了《孔子家語》等書。自20世紀七八十年代來,隨著相關出土文獻的研究,爲《家語》的成書和真僞問題的探究提供了新的證據。《家語》“僞書説”並無確鑿的理論依據,《家語》的大部分内容是切實可靠的,且具有不可替代的文獻價值。 Confucianism, “the book process and the authenticity of the issue, dynasties scholars argue endlessly, many suspicions that Wang Su in order to refute Zheng Xuan’s school, in the name of Confucius, forged a” Confucius “and other books. Since the seventies and eighties of the 20th century, with the study of the related unearthed literature, new evidence has been provided for the exploration of the bookmaking and authenticity of ”Jiayu“. There is no solid theoretical basis for ”family language“ or ”pseudo-book theory.“ Most of the ”family language" is credible and irreplaceable.