2小时作出押扁判决陈水扁洗钱案等四大弊案早前就被有关方面要求依“后案并前案”的方式,并给蔡守训的合议庭审理。但当时蔡守训却以“合议庭”的前案范围小、后案范围大为由,拒绝了该提议。相关媒体事后分析,蔡守训当时之所以不愿意并案,关键在于他坚守法律程序。最后法院经过投票,才决定将陈水扁案件全部由蔡守训的“合议庭”审理。 The two major drawbacks of making Chen Shui-bian money-laundering cases such as Chen Shui-bian decree for 2 hours were earlier asked by the parties concerned for “post-case and prior case” and to hear the collegiate bench of Cai Shou-xun. At that time, however, Cai Shouxun rejected the proposal because of the small scope of the former case of “collegial panel” and the large scope of the case. After the relevant media analysis, Cai Shou-lun was reluctant because the case was the case, the key lies in his adherence to legal procedures. After the court finally voted, it decided that all the Chen Shui-bian cases should be heard by the “collegial panel” of Cai Shou-xun.