论文部分内容阅读
编者按:秉持学术传承、倡导理性判别和学术争鸣,是《改革》引领学术趋向、引导学界观念一以贯之的编辑准则。为弘扬发自《改革》的学术观点,搭建《改革》作者、编辑部与《改革》受众三方互动交流平台,推动《改革》一贯倡导的转型期中国经济学研究的稳健发展,《改革》编辑部自2009年第2期起,对“争鸣”栏目进行全新定位,专发对《改革》已发表论文的学术观点进行争鸣的文章。
Editor’s Note: uphold academic heritage, advocate rational discrimination and academic debate is the “reform” to lead academic trends and guide the academic concept of a consistent editorial guidelines. In order to promote the academic viewpoints originated from “reform,” we should establish an interactive platform for the exchange and exchange between the authors and editorial departments of “reform” and the “reforming” audiences and promote the steady development of China’s economic studies in the transitional period as “reform” has always advocated. The editor of “Reform” Since 2009, No. 2, the Ministry has made a new position on the topic of “Contending,” and has made some arguements about the academic point of view of the “reform” of published papers.