论文部分内容阅读
目的比较非脱垂子宫经阴道切除术与传统经腹切除术的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析我院自2010年9月～2012年10月收治的92例行子宫切除术患者的临床资料,按不同手术方法分为观察组(非脱垂子宫经阴道切除术)47例和对照组(传统经腹切除术)45例,对比分析两组患者的临床治疗效果。结果两组手术时间及术中出血量差异不大,无统计学意义(P>0.05),而观察组患者肛门排气时间、下床活动时间、住院时间均短于对照组,观察组手术并发症的发生率明显低于对照组,二者差异显著,具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论非脱垂子宫经阴道切除术具有创伤小、并发症少、恢复快等优点,值得临床推广。
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of non-prolapsed uterus vaginal resection and conventional abdominal resection. Methods The clinical data of 92 patients who underwent hysterectomy in our hospital from September 2010 to October 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different surgical methods, 47 cases were divided into observation group (non-prolapsed hysteroscopic vaginal resection) and Control group (traditional abdominal resection) 45 cases, comparative analysis of two groups of patients with clinical treatment. Results There was no significant difference in operative time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P> 0.05), while the anal exhaust time, ambulation time and hospital stay in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group and the observation group was complicated by surgery The incidence of disease was significantly lower than the control group, the difference was significant and statistically significant (P <0.01). Conclusion Non-prolapsed uterine vaginal resection has the advantages of less trauma, fewer complications and faster recovery, which is worthy of clinical promotion.