论文部分内容阅读
如果从本土的视角来参详马华文学史,南洋色彩的提倡(1927-1930)、马来亚地方作家论争(1934)和“马华文艺独特性”论争(1947-1948)这三个基点不仅引人注目,而且至关重要。重新思考它们的意义不是重复劳作,而是在部分重现历史现场的基础上,考察马华文学本土在20世纪20-40年代演变的粗线条轨迹,同时指出其中的悖论/吊诡和张力,也希望能够借此从不同视角(1.文学地理的具象化;2.文学层面的质变;3.文化/政治:捆绑的复杂化)探勘本土蜕变的谱系学。
If we refer to the history of MCA literature from a local perspective, the three basic points of the Nanyang color advocacy (1927-1930), the Malayan local writers’ argument (1934) and the “MCA uniqueness” debate (1947-1948) Attention, but also crucial. Rethinking their significance is not duplication of work, but on the basis of partial reproduction of historical sites, to examine the thick-line trajectory of the evolution of the MCA literature in the 1920s-1940s and to point out the paradoxes / paradoxes and tensions therein It is thus possible to explore the pedigree of indigenous metamorphosis from a different perspective (1. The visualization of literary geography; 2. The qualitative change at the literary level; 3. Culture / Politics: The complication of bundling).