甘肃地区的远古文化遗存是丰富多彩的,从1923年起便在这里有了很多发现,并根据它作出所谓“六期”的分期工作。这种分期是片面的唯心观点,只是从器物的形态和纹饰上出发,完全缺乏地层上的证据。近几年来我国的考古工作者也曾针对着上述的错误观点进行过一系列的批判,由于资料的限制,虽然击中它理论上的要害,但仍缺少实际发现的证明。目前只有个别的人还在“抱残守缺”,而大多数的人却感到旧的已被批判,新的尚未建立,遇到这类问题, The ancient cultural relics in Gansu are rich and colorful. Since 1923, there have been many discoveries here, and according to it, the so-called “six-period” staging work has been carried out. This staging is a one-sided view of the idealism, only starting from the morphology and decoration of the utensils, completely lacking evidence of the formation. In recent years, archaeologists in our country have also conducted a series of criticisms against the above erroneous viewpoints. Due to limitations of the materials, although they hit the key point in theory, they still lack actual proofs of discovery. At present, only a few individuals are still “unscrupulous”, while most people feel that the old ones have been criticized and the new ones have not yet been established. When such problems are encountered,