初不知逆向思维为何物,读了几篇文章之后才明白,原来就是“反过来想想”。说法一变,就好像在谈高深的学术问题似的了。好吧,咱也来“逆”他一回。 流行歌曲在沿海流行了一阵子之后,现在好像已经不像起初那么吃香了。于是,一些歌星开始向中西部进军。听好几个人说,一位歌星到一个贫困地区(或者是不够发达的地区)演出,拿了8万元出场费。据说报纸上已经披露。舆论的倾向当然是一边倒的,总是批评歌星见钱眼开之类。正是在这一点上,咱们试试来一下逆向思维。 如今是搞市场经济,买方和卖方,“姜太公钓鱼,愿者上钩”,“周瑜打黄盖,一个愿打,一个愿挨”,两厢情愿就行,只要演出的一方照章纳税,并不犯法,舆论界絮絮何为?若说下岗工人如何如何,6500万贫困人口如何如何,那与演员何干?按劳取酬,少劳笨 At first I did not know why reverse thinking, after reading a few articles to understand, turned out to be “turn around and think.” A change of opinion, it seems like a deep academic question about it. Well, let’s also “reverse” him once. Popular pop songs in the coastal popular for a while, now seems not so popular at first. As a result, some singers began to march to the Midwest. Listen to a few people said that a singer to a poor area (or less developed areas) performance, took 80,000 yuan appearance fee. It is said that the newspaper has been disclosed. Of course, the propensity of public opinion is one-sided, always criticizing singers such as the open-minded and the like. It is at this point, let’s try the reverse thinking. Today is engaged in a market economy, the buyer and the seller, “Jiang Taigong fishing, willing to hook”, “Zhou Yu playing yellow cover, one is willing to fight, one is willing to suffer,” wishful thinking on the line, as long as the performance of the parties pay taxes, does not break the law, If the laid-off workers how, how the 65 million poor people, that with the actor what? According to work pay, less stupid