对于错误生命之诉所提出的“生命存在本身可否构成损害”这一价值难题,出于对生命之存在即价值和人性尊严之所在的信念的坚守,多数学者对此持否定态度,肯定论则通过对生命主体自我价值体验和自决的强调,借助错误生命与安乐死的类比,得出了“生命存在本身亦得构成损害”的结论。肯定论虽在论证上有诸多不周之处,但也说明我们对生命客观价值的坚守并非在任何情况下都毫无回旋的余地。 For the wrong life complaint, “the existence of life itself can constitute damage” is the value of the problem, out of the existence of life that is the value and perseverance of where the human dignity, the majority of scholars hold a negative attitude, affirmed On the other hand, through the emphasis on the experience of self-worth and the self-determination of life subject, with the help of the analogy between wrong life and euthanasia, we come to the conclusion that “the existence of life itself can also constitute damage”. Affirmation Although there are many inaccuracies in the demonstration, it also shows that our adherence to the objective value of life is not without room for maneuver in any circumstances.