论文部分内容阅读
《反不正当竞争法》第20条规定了反不正当竞争案件中损害赔偿额的计算方法,但是对于既无充分证据证明原告损失、也无法认定被告所得的情况,没有相应的规定。司法实践中,为了解决此类案件,法院进行了各种探索,并逐渐确立了定额赔偿的制度。但此种制度一直受到合法性的困扰。在商标法、著作权法以及专利法明确规定法定赔偿金制度后,反不正当竞争法中确立此种制度也势在必行。而法学理论界对这一制度变迁未能提供相应的理论支持与关注,是法学研究值得总结的教训。本文通过对我国司法案例的类型化整理与系统考察,对这一制度变迁过程进行了研究。
Article 20 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law stipulates the method of calculating damages in unfair competition cases. However, there is no corresponding regulation on the plaintiffs’ loss or the loss of plaintiff’s claims. In judicial practice, in order to solve such cases, the court conducted various explorations and gradually established a system of fixed compensation. However, such a system has been plagued by legitimacy. After the trademark law, the copyright law and the patent law explicitly stipulate the system of statutory damages, it is imperative to establish such a system in the Anti-Unfair Competition Law. However, the legal theory circle failed to provide the corresponding theoretical support and attention to the change of the system, which is a lesson worthy of summarizing in the law research. In this paper, through the classification of judicial cases in our country and systematic investigation, this paper studies the process of institutional change.