论文部分内容阅读
如果研究马克思主义文学理论,就难以回避意识形态这一重要维度,意识形态的组成是复杂多样的,有属于思想观念的意识形态,也有属于感性表现形式的意识形态,如果把多种意识形态仅仅归结为诸种思想观念的一个综合概念,则必然阉割了多种意识形态的具体性和丰富性。20世纪以来,意识形态阐释的多语境化使其被赋予了不同含义,当今欧美国家一些理论家所宣扬的“意识形态终结论”、“意识形态必然是虚假意识”、“全球化意识形态论”或“意识形态知识化论”,对中国一些学者产生了影响,如果极少鉴别地搬用他们的各种理论,或是在文学理论中极力淡化意识形态理论,则有可能把意识形态仅仅视为一个批判性概念、功能性概念,进而虚化各种意识形态。
If we study the theory of Marxist literature, it will be hard to evade the important dimension of ideology. The composition of ideology is complex and diverse. There are ideologies that belong to ideological concepts and ideologies that belong to perceptual forms. If you combine multiple ideologies with mere ideologies A comprehensive concept, which is attributed to all kinds of ideological concepts, will inevitably cast off the concreteness and richness of various ideologies. Since the 20th century, the multilingualism of ideological interpretation has given it different meanings. The “end of ideology” proclaimed by some theorists in Europe and the United States, “the ideology must be false consciousness” and “the ideology of globalization Theory ”or“ the theory of the ideology of knowledge ”has had an impact on some Chinese scholars. If the various theories of the Chinese were to be applied with little or no discrimination, or the theory of ideology was to be despised in literary theory, it would be possible to separate the ideology It is regarded as a critical concept and a functional concept, which in turn blurs various ideologies.