论文部分内容阅读
中西比较文学起步晚、起点低,正值发展上升期,遭遇了欧美学界一边倒的“比较文学将死”论,宣称比较文学终将消亡。然而,斯皮瓦克在《学科之死》一书中“打破语言界限和区域界限”的想法与中国比较文学第三阶段的发展步伐不谋而合,即,将中国五千年文明与传统文化和比较文学以及世界文学结合起来,打破民族、国家、语言和学科等领域的界限,找准自身的学科定位,破除“文化霸权主义”壁垒,实现“多元文化共生”的美好期许,使比较文学获得新生。
The comparative literature of China and the West started late, started low and landed at a time when its development was on the rise. It encountered the theory that “comparative literature will die” and claimed that comparative literature will eventually die out. However, Spivak’s idea of “breaking linguistic boundaries and regional boundaries” in The Death of a Discipline coincides with the development of the third phase of Chinese comparative literature, that is, integrating the five thousand years of Chinese civilization Combine traditional culture with comparative literature and world literature to break the boundaries of ethnic, national, linguistic and academic fields, identify its own subject orientation, break down the barriers to cultural hegemony and achieve “multiculturalism” The better expectations, so that a new comparative literature.