论文部分内容阅读
2009年10月29日,徐肖冰老人走了。本刊第12期以他和他老伴——侯波老师在“鸟巢”前的合影作封面,以怀念这位从延安走来的老一辈摄影家,我们深深感到一代大师渐行渐远的苍凉和无尽的瞩望。令人宽慰的是,转过年来第二季度,“徐肖冰杯”全国摄影大展就开始征稿了。这是继沙飞奖、侯登科奖、石少华奖设立之后又一个以摄影家名字命名的大奖。这是由徐老的家乡——浙江桐乡市与中国摄影家协会联合主办的一个全国性展览,意在表彰那些“影像关注社会,艺术传达思想”的作品和摄影师。虽然我们对“徐肖冰杯”这样的提法不很习惯,觉得称为“徐肖冰摄影奖”更为妥帖,但这个奖项的设立还是显示了徐老家乡人民的文化价值判断和远见,也代表了摄影界后人的共识。我们举双手赞成设立这个奖。评选的过程从头至尾就是研讨会。就我们的个人经验来说,觉得这个研讨会开得严肃认真,有了不同观点的真正交锋。评委的构成来自不同方向,观点差异比较大,但大家出于对徐老的一份真诚,都平心静气,小心而耐心地陈述自己的观点。其实,这次征稿采取与全国影展一样的分类方法,正好把当前摄影界的现状一股脑端给了大家,7万多张照片,有5万张是在几天内从屏幕上翻看,劳烦之板。而每个评委都在忐忑不安的状态下困惑,比如刘树勇在思想与思想贫困之间困惑;孙京涛在关注现实、敢于担当与游山玩水、浮光掠影之间困惑;陈小波在徐肖冰这个名字与不搭调照片之间困惑;任悦在新闻更真实,还是艺术更真实之间困惑;杨大洲在艺术不艺术,传统的艺术哪里去了的问题上困惑……评委是认真的,敢于说出不同意见。通过评选,大大加深了彼此之间的了解。为了让广大读者系统了解这次评选的观点、作品和研讨过程,启发大家从更多方面、更多角度思考问题,实实在在地推进摄影创作,本期特刊发这次评选结束后召开的研讨会纪要,敬请关注。同时,我们希望有更多的人参与讨论,并给本刊来稿。来稿请发责任编辑电子邮箱yanglijun@chnaphoto.cc
October 29, 2009, Xu Xiaobing elderly gone. With his and his wife - Mr. Hou Bo in front of the “Bird’s Nest” in front of a photo cover, in memory of the older generation came from Yanan photographer, we deeply feel a generation of master gradually Desolated desolation and endless looking. It is relief that, in the second quarter of the year, “Xu Xiaobing Cup,” the National Photography Exhibition began to solicit contributions. This is the second Shakespeare Award, Hou Dengke Award, Shi Shaohua Award after the establishment of another photographer named the grand prize. This is a national exhibition co-sponsored by Xu Lao’s hometown of Tongxiang, Zhejiang Province and the China Photographers Association, in recognition of those works and photographers who are “concerned with the society and art that convey images”. Although we are not accustomed to the formulation of “Xu Xiaobing Cup,” we think it is more appropriate to call it the “Xu Xiao Bing Photography Award.” However, the establishment of this award shows the cultural value judgment and foresight of the people in Xu’s hometown. Also represents the consensus of future generations of photography. We give both hands in favor of setting up this award. The selection process is a seminar from start to finish. As far as our personal experience is concerned, I feel that this seminar was truly serious and had a genuine confrontation with different points of view. The composition of the judges came from different directions and the opinions were quite different. However, all of them expressed their views with great sincerity and patience. Actually, this solicitation has taken the same classification method as that of the National Film Festival just to present the current situation of the photographic industry to everyone. Over 70 000 photographs and 50,000 photographs are read from the screen within a few days. board. Each jury is confused in uneasy state, such as Liu Shuyong puzzled between ideological and ideological poverty; Sun Jingtao is concerned about the reality, dare to play with the sightseeing tour of the mountains, floating glimpse; Chen Xiaobo in the name of Xu Xiaobing with no disagreement Any puzzled photo; Ren Yue in the news more real, or more confused between the art; Yang Dazhou art is not art, where the traditional art of the problem ... ... Judges are serious and dare to say different opinions. Through the selection, greatly deepened mutual understanding. In order to make readers understand systematically the views, works and seminars of this selection, we can inspire everyone to think more about the issue from more perspectives and truly push forward the photography creation. This special issue of the symposium held after the conclusion of this selection Will be minutes, so stay tuned. At the same time, we hope more people will participate in the discussion and contribute to the publication. Please submit the manuscript editor email yanglijun@chnaphoto.cc