论文部分内容阅读
我国版权犯罪的定罪标准存在营利目的与占有目的区分困难、混合销售的情况下较难认定行为人的营利目的、单位内部大量使用复制品时很难认定其营利目的等主观问题,以及犯罪对象是否包括假冒他人署名的美术作品、“复制”与“发行”关系不合理、非法出租侵权复制品的行为定性不明确等客观问题。对此,应坚持罪刑法定优先,同时兼顾刑法目的适用刑法。
The standard of criminal conviction of copyright crime in our country is difficult to distinguish between profit making purpose and possession purpose. It is difficult to identify the profit-making purpose of the perpetrator in the case of mixed sales, and the subjective problems such as profit-making purpose when it is widely used in the unit, and whether the criminal target is Including the fake signatures of other works of art, “copy ” and “distribution ” unreasonable relationship, the illegitimate rental of infringing copies of the qualitative uncertainty of objective problems. In this regard, we should uphold the statutory priority of crime and punishment, taking into account the criminal law criminal law.