当前实践中对如何处理看守所已决犯的保外就医问题，存在着两种截然不同的做祛。一是在法院明确作出暂予监外执行决定后，看守所依此具体办理保外就医手续；二是看守所自行决定保外就医。这两种做法究竟谁是正确的？我们认为，前者基本符合法律规定。其理由主要是以下三点：第 In the current practice, there are two very different ways to deal with the problem of foreign-funded medical treatment that the detention center has committed. First, after the court made the decision on the temporary execution of supervision outside the prison, the detention center handled the procedures of seeking medical treatment outside the territory on the basis of this. The second was that the detention center decided to go abroad for medical treatment. Who exactly is these two practices correct? We think the former basically complies with the law. The reason is mainly the following three points: the first