《老残游记》被鲁迅称为清末四大谴责小说之一,是谴责小说的经典传世之作。但实际上,《老残游记》究竟属不属于谴责小说,其中存在的非谴责因素多还是谴责因素多等问题一直是文学界热议的话题之一。本文认为《老残游记》并非鲁迅所说的是谴责小说,其中存在的非谴责因素远远要胜过谴责因素。很多人知道《老残游记》大概不是因为亲自阅读了这本名著,而是因为鲁迅给这本书归为谴责类小说,历经时代传承,就成了众所周知的晚清四大谴责 “Lao Tsang Travels” was called by Lu Xun one of the four censure novels in the late Qing dynasty, which is a classic of condemning novels. However, in fact, “Lao Travels” is not belong to the condemnation of novels, there are more non-condemnation factors or more blame factors and other issues has been one of the hot topics in the literature. This paper argues that the travelogue of Lao Tsang is not what Lu Xun said is condemning the novel, in which the non-condemnation factor is far more than the condemnation factor. Many people know that “Travels to Lao Travels” probably did not read this book personally, but because Lu Xun gave the book as a condemned novel, which has become known as the Four Censures in the late Qing dynasty