自从东晋郭璞在《尔雅》注中讲了“以徂为存,犹以乱为治,以曩为向,以故为今,此皆训诂义有反复旁通,美恶不嫌同名”的话以后,有人根据郭说,创造了“反训”一名,提出了“反训”一说。很多人在郭例的基础上,广搜博求、综辑“反训”词例。但是,也有人不同意郭说,否定“反训”的存在。毫无疑问,这些不同观点的争论对探索“反训”产生的根源、科学地解释这一语言现象,揭示其本质,正确地运用训诂工具等方面具有重要意义。这篇小文试以郭 Since the Eastern Jin Guo Pu in the “Erya” note about “to save as, still chaos for the rule, as the guide, so for this reason, all these are repeated by-pass interpretation of justice, the United States and Europe do not have the same name” After that, some people said according to Guo that they had created a “counter-training” one and proposed a “counter-training” one. Many people on the basis of Guo cases, the broad search Bo seek, the compilation of “anti-training” words. However, some people disagree with Guo saying that they negate the existence of “anti-training.” Undoubtedly, the debate on these different points of view is of great significance in exploring the root causes of “anti-training”, in scientifically explaining this linguistic phenomenon, in revealing its essence, and in correctly using training tools. This small article to test Guo