档案学作为一个知识体系已为世所公认,特别是近年来各种档案学论著相继问世,档案理论研究呈现出百花齐放的喜人局面。但是,也有一种倾向应该引起注意。这就是在已出版的档案图书中被冠以“学”的越来越多。而且有蔓延滥用之势。一些介绍某一种档案具体管理方法的图书往往被名为《××档案管理学》而出版,其篇章结构也都大同小异,无非是“××档案的收集”、“××档案的整理”、“××档案的鉴定”……千书一面,仅档案种类名称不同而已。“学”者,学科也,它是按照学问的性质而划分的门类,指一定的科学领域或一门科学的分支。可见,学科是要科学区分的,不是随便什么论著都可以称 Archival science as a knowledge system has been recognized by the world, especially in recent years a variety of archival studies have come out, the archives theory shows a gratifying flourishing situation. However, there is also a tendency that should attract attention. This is the growing number of titles that have been “learned” in published archives. And there is the tendency of spreading abuse. Some books that introduce a specific management method for archives are often published under the title of “XX Archives Management.” The textual structure of the books is also very much the same. They are nothing more than “collection of ×× archives” and “collation of ×× archives” “× × file identification” ...... One thousand books side, only the file type name is different only. “Learning”, discipline, it is divided according to the nature of the academic category, refers to a certain area of ​​science or a branch of science. Can be seen that the subject is to be scientific distinction, not just what the treatise can be said