明代中叶刊刻元杂剧常常以“折”划分场次,由此之后,后人只要论及元杂剧的结构形式无不称一本四折,可见以“折”作为划分元杂剧场次的标志已成惯例,形成了一种固有的观念。于是,后来研治元杂剧的专家学者为其所囿,“顺理成章”地用明代以来形成的“折”的概念去套解《元刊杂剧三十种》的“一折”。虽然先后有钱南扬、周贻白、张庚和郭汉城等先生提出各种新说,看似意见分歧较大,实则都未能突破明人的藩篱,总是在以“折”划分场次的框架内苦苦探 In the middle of the Ming Dynasty, the novels of the Yuan Dynasty were often divided into “zhu zu”, from which the descendants could refer to the za za Signs have become the rule, forming an inherent concept. As a result, experts and scholars who later studied and treated the Yuan drama for their own “logical ” to use the concept of “folding ” formed since the Ming Dynasty to solve the . Although there have been money Nan Yang, Zhou Yi Bai, Zhang Geng and Guo Hancheng made a variety of new comments, seemingly divided views of larger, but in fact failed to break the Ming’s barriers, always in the In the framework of bitter exploration