论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨Hood技术在机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)中应用的可行性及安全性。方法:回顾性分析2020年6月至2021年3月华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院收治的24例采用Hood技术行RARP患者的临床资料。年龄平均67.8(57～76)岁，体质指数平均25.17(18.31～32.54)kg/mn 2，术前总前列腺特异性抗原平均18.36(4.21～67.57)ng/ml。所有患者术前穿刺均明确诊断，Gleason评分平均7.3(6～8)分。术前临床分期Tn 1c期1例，Tn 2a期5例，Tn 2b期4例，Tn 2c期14例。所有患者均行RARP，术中采用Hood技术，其特点为经前入路保留Retzius间隙，手术操作层面紧贴膀胱前壁，耻骨后骨盆结构及前列腺外膜轮廓均不显露。分析患者手术结果、术后病理及随访情况。n 结果:24例手术均顺利完成，无中转开放手术。手术时间(机械臂操作时间)平均84.5(63～110)min，出血量平均75.3(20～180)ml。术后19例留置引流管，平均留置3.7(3～5)d，5例未留置引流管。术后住院时间平均7.1(4～11)d，术后尿管留置时间平均7.3(6～9)d。23例拔除尿管后即刻实现尿控，1例术后2周实现尿控。术后病理：pTn 2a期4例，pTn 2b期6例，pTn 2c期14例；Gleason评分平均7.9(6～9)分。无切缘阳性病例。术后随访3～12个月，无因手术并发症再次入院病例，所有患者末次随访均无肿瘤复发。n 结论:RARP术中应用Hood技术，可简化Retzius间隙保留步骤，手术切缘阳性率低，术后即刻尿控效果好。“,”Objective:To explore the feasibility, safety and short-term effect of the Hood technique in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).Methods:The data of 24 patients with localized prostate cancer underwent RARP with Hood technique From June 2020 to March 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The mean age was 67.8 (57-76) years, and the mean body mass index was 25.17(18.31-32.54)kg/mn 2. The mean tPSA value was 18.36(4.21-67.57)ng/ml and the mean biopsy Gleason score was 7.3 (6-8). In term of the clinical T stage, the 24 cases were composed of the Tn 1c stage in 1 case, Tn 2a stage in 5 cases, Tn 2b stage in 4 cases and Tn 2c stage in 14 cases. During Hood technique, the anterior bladder were limitedly isolated without exposing the outline of pelvis and prostate.n Results:All the cases were completed robotically without conversion, transfusion or positive surgical margin. The average robot-assisted operation time was 84.5(63-110) mins. Estimated blood loss was 75.3(20-180) ml. The average time for maintaining the drain was 3.7(3-5) days. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 7.1(4-11) days. The mean catheterization time was 7.3(6-9) days after surgery. 23 patients achieved continence immediately after catheter removal, while 1 patient had continence full-recovery 2 weeks after surgery. The mean surgical Gleason score was 7.9 (6-9). In term of the surgical T stage, the 24 cases were composed of the pTn 2a stage in 4 case, Tn 2b stage in 6 cases, Tn 2c stage in 14 cases.During 3-12 months’ follow-up, no biochemical recurrence was found.n Conclusions:Hood technique were safe and valid in RARP with excellent immediate continence recovery. It facilitated Retzius sparing in a convenient approach with low positive surgical margin rate.