论文部分内容阅读
曹操《气出倡》三首是模拟汉代古曲之作,古辞丢失,曲题难明。古今学人对曹操之作颇多误解,如认定为游仙之作,没有积极意义,且与曹操“性不信天命”“见欺神仙”之精神相悖。本文经多方考索分析,以为曹操《气出倡》并非求仙之作,而是描摹由“仙倡”表演的乐舞百戏,并对汉古曲《气出》之题义作出蠡测,其与汉代迎气活动密切相关,类似于“月令迎气乐”的乐舞表演。在此基础上,联系建安时期的公宴诗予以多方证明,《气出倡》三首为“游宴”而非“游仙”。曹操本人在求仙态度方面并无矛盾之处。
Cao Cao “gas out of the three” is to simulate the ancient song of the Han Dynasty, ancient Ci lost, difficult to understand the subject. Ancient and modern scholars made a lot of misunderstandings on Cao Cao, such as identified as a fairy for the work, there is no positive meaning, and with Cao Cao “do not believe in God ” “see the gods ” contrary to the spirit. Based on the analysis of many ways, this paper thinks that Cao Cao’s “Qi Chuang Yi” is not a fairy tale, but a tracing of the music and dance performed by “Xianyi” Test, which is closely related to the Han Dynasty welcome activities, similar to the “monthly order Ying Le ” music and dance performances. On this basis, the public banquet poems in connection with the Jian’an period have been proved by many parties. The three poems of “Qi Chuang Chuang” are “banquets” rather than “Xiuxian”. Cao Cao I immoral attitude there is no contradiction between.