论文部分内容阅读
学界将创造文明和价值增殖看作资本的双重逻辑。然而,资本不仅具有创造文明的逻辑,而且存在与之相反的摧毁文明的逻辑。摧毁文明逻辑和价值增殖逻辑并不相同。价值增殖的逻辑必然同时衍生出创造文明和摧毁文明这两种对立的逻辑,并牢固地支配它们的运作。资本在运动中还呈现出提高效率逻辑与降低效率逻辑、竞争逻辑与垄断逻辑、公共性逻辑与私独性逻辑等诸多相互矛盾的正向逻辑和负向逻辑。但这两类逻辑都由价值增殖逻辑所规约,并服从和服务于价值增殖逻辑。唯有价值增殖逻辑是资本的核心逻辑,其他逻辑都只是资本的附属逻辑。资本核心逻辑和附属逻辑的分野,在理论上有助于深化对资本逻辑与现代世界之矛盾性的理解;在实践上启示现代民众特别是当代中国合理对待资本及其逻辑,建构更高文明形态。
The academic community regards the creation of civilization and value proliferation as the dual logic of capital. However, capital not only has the logic of creating civilization, but also has the opposite logic of destroying civilization. The logic of destroying civilization and value proliferation is not the same. The logic of value proliferation inevitably at the same time derives the logic of the two opposing creations of civilization and destruction of civilization and firmly dominates their operation. During the movement of capital, capital also showed many contradictory positive and negative logic of increasing efficiency logic, reducing efficiency logic, competition logic and monopoly logic, public logic and private logic. But both types of logic are governed by the logic of value proliferation and obey and serve the logic of value proliferation. Only the logic of value proliferation is the core logic of capital. All other logic is only the subsidiary logic of capital. The division of core logic and subsidiary logic in theory helps to deepen the understanding of the contradiction between capital logic and the modern world in theory. It suggests that modern people, especially contemporary China, treat capital and its logic rationally and construct a higher civilization .