论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨在治疗子宫肌瘤疾病方面传统的剥除术和腹腔镜下的剥除术的区别,分析腹腔镜下对子宫肌瘤进行剥除的优势。方法选择在2009年2月~2012年2月在本院接受治疗的子宫肌瘤患者60例,将其按照住院顺序随机分为两组,即治疗组与对照组,每组人数均等。对照组患者采用的是传统剥除术治疗子宫肌瘤,治疗组患者则选择腹腔镜下剥除术对子宫肌瘤进行治疗。治疗结束后比较两组患者的手术后的排气时间、出血量以及住院的天数。结果在治疗结束后,在出血量方面进行比较,治疗组患者少于对照组患者,另外在术后排气的时间以及住院的天数方面治疗组患者均优于对照组,两组患者差异具有统计学意义。结论在腹腔镜下对子宫肌瘤进行剥除手术,是效果较为理想的手术方式,在手术中出血量较小,恢复使用的时间也较短,缩短了住院的时间等独特的优势,有利于患者早日康复,值得在临床中推广使用。
Objective To explore the difference between laparoscopic and conventional laparoscopic stripping in the treatment of uterine myoma and to analyze the advantages of laparoscopic stripping of uterine leiomyoma. Methods Sixty patients with uterine leiomyoma who were treated in our hospital from February 2009 to February 2012 were randomly divided into two groups according to the hospitalization order, that is, the treatment group and the control group, with equal numbers in each group. Patients in the control group were treated with conventional stripping surgery for uterine fibroids, and patients in the treatment group were treated with laparoscopic ablation for uterine fibroids. After the treatment, the postoperative exhaust time, the amount of bleeding and the days of hospitalization were compared between the two groups. Results After treatment, the amount of bleeding were compared in the treatment group, patients with less than the control group, the other in the postoperative exhaust time and days of hospitalization were better than the control group, the two groups were statistically significant differences Significance of learning. Conclusion laparoscopic hysterectomy for the removal of uterine fibroids, the effect is an ideal surgical approach, less bleeding during surgery, the recovery time is shorter, shorter hospitalization time and other unique advantages, is conducive to Patients recover soon, it is worth promoting in clinical use.