论文部分内容阅读
在今年初召开的剧本创作座谈会上,我讲过这样一句话:“但愿这个会议在历史上能记载下来是个功,而不是个过。”到底是功是过?到目前为止我觉得还不能定论。沙叶新同志说这次会议客观上带来一些不好的作用,但主观愿望是好的。我认为还不到定论的时候,因为历史还太短。但是创作会议以后,的确出现了一个比较沉闷的局面,有人说这是创作会议的原因,我看不能简单下结论,我认为不仅仅是创作会议的原因。李准同志在《人民日报》发表了一篇文章,谈现象与本质。有人说这个作品反映了本质,有人说那个作品没有反映本质。我认为任何一个现象都是这样或那样的本质的反映,问题是对本质的认识每人站的立场不一
At the script writing symposium held earlier this year, I said the following sentence: “I hope this meeting can be recorded in history as a merit, not an excuse.” So far, what is the merits? So far, I think Can not be conclusive. Comrade Sha Ye Xin said that the meeting objectively brought some bad functions, but the subjective desire is good. I think it is not yet conclusive, because history is still too short. However, after the creation of the conference, indeed, there appeared a rather dull situation. Some people said that this is the reason for the conference. I can not conclude this simply. I think it is not just the reason for writing a conference. Comrade Li Zhun published an article in People’s Daily on the phenomenon and essence. Some people say that this work reflects the essence, some people say that the work did not reflect the essence. I think any phenomenon is a reflection of one way or another. The problem is that each person’s position on the nature is different.