论文部分内容阅读
在公文上标引主题词的制度,在我国已推广实行多年了,众所周知,主题词对于公文的现行阶段,是毫无用处的,显而易见,实行这一制度的主要目的,是为档案(包括情报、资料)工作的自动化管理提供数据准备.那么作为最终要使用这些数据的档案馆,是如何看待、估价这一制度呢?或者说,他们是否能够接受、应该如何接受这些数据呢?最近,拜读了冯惠玲、李华的《档案工作现代化的重大课题》一文,冯、李二同志主张基本上完整地接收这些数据,却对目前公文上所标引的主题词并不十分满意,因而还主张采取一些措施,加强控制,促使主题标引工作达到一定的质量标准,使“一次采集的数据‘终生受用’”.同时,冯、李二同志的文章中也提到另外一种意见,许多档案馆工作人员对这些数据不
The system of marking keywords on official documents has been in practice for many years in our country. As we all know, the keywords are useless for the current stage of official documents. Obviously, the main purpose of implementing this system is to provide documents (including information , Data) work to provide data for the preparation of the data as the ultimate use of these archives and how to evaluate this system? Or that they can accept, how to accept the data? Recently, reading FENG Hui-ling, LI Hua, “A Major Project for the Modernization of Archives,” Comrade Feng and Li Li advocated that these data be basically and completely received but are not quite satisfied with the current key words quoted in the official documents. Therefore, they also advocate the adoption of Some measures to step up control so as to bring the subject matter indexing up to a certain quality standard so that “the data once collected” will be used for life. "Meanwhile, Comrade von Lee and Li Erla mentioned another opinion in his article. Many archives Staff does not have these data