论文部分内容阅读
在以成渝两地为试点展开的中国“城乡统筹发展试验区”的过程中,以“新农村建设”为平台的乡村试验加快了土地整治,努力解决城乡二元结构,明确中国城市化发展方向,并以此为契机,为解决“三农问题”提供了一个很好的机会。这个试验为推进“三个集中”、加快土地资源资本化、社会资金资本化起到了积极的推动作用。但由于没有成熟经验和统一的模式可借鉴,不免在具体实施中出现一些需要解决的问题,“不对称伦理”就是其中之一。本文通过引入“不对称伦理”的概念,力求为更好地实施新农村建设建言献策。
In the trial of “China’s urban and rural development pilot zone” piloted by Chengdu and Chongqing, rural trials based on “new rural construction” accelerated land readjustment, worked hard to solve the dual structure of urban and rural areas, China’s urbanization direction and take this as an opportunity to provide a good opportunity to solve the “three rural issues.” This experiment has played a positive role in promoting “three concentrations”, accelerating the capitalization of land resources and capitalizing social funds. However, because there is no mature experience and a unified model can learn from, some problems that need to be solved can not help but appear in the actual implementation. The “asymmetric ethics” is one of them. By introducing the concept of “asymmetric ethics”, this paper seeks to offer advice and suggestions for better implementation of new rural construction.