论文部分内容阅读
法律出版社2003年5月初版的《元照英美法词典》,颇受欢迎,以之为堪与Black’s法律词典媲美——盖据传该词典乃以Blak’s所编的Law Dictionary(6th Edition)为蓝本者也。 我为形势所逼,趁今夏濡暑,名副其实地汗流浃背、赤膊上阵,以六尺耄耋之躯勉为其难,现就初步浏览所得,试为之勘误补遗,以求正于大方也。 一、6版Black’s漏了“regulations”一目(但有“regulation”一目而已),《元照》亦步其后尘。然今之英美法词典中,“regulations“一语非但没漏,且有单独自成一目者,如:
Law Press first edition in May 2003, ”the British-American legal dictionary“, popular, as comparable with Black’s legal dictionary - cover rumors of the dictionary is based on Blak’s Law Dictionary (6th Edition) for Blue also. I forced by the situation, taking advantage of this Summer Runsu, a truly sweaty, shirtless, to the six-foot grievances for its own hard, now on the initial exploration proceeds, try for the errard addendum, in order to seek positive and generous too. One, Sixth Edition Black’s leaked ”regulations“ (but with ”regulation“ only), and ”Yuanzhao“ follow suit. However, in the Anglo-American law dictionary today, the term ”regulations " not only does not leak, but also has its own uniqueness. For example,