蔡梦弼《杜工部草堂诗话》荟萃了自北宋中期到南宋中期名家论杜、评杜之语,历来认为研究价值颇高。深研细读,比互参校,既有利于加深对杜诗的理解把握,也可以就各家的不同说法进行重新审视,个中得失易见。诸家观点未妥未善之处,提出来与方家分享。此篇主要辨析黄庭坚、高元之关于陶渊明、杜甫教子诗的不同观点及师古评杜诗的与众不同见解。 Cai Mengbi Du department “Caotang Poetry” metaphor from the middle of the Northern Song Dynasty to the mid-Southern Song Dynasty famous Du, Du language, has always considered the research value is high. Studying deeply and comparing each other is not only conducive to deepening the understanding of Du Fu, but also revisiting the different opinions of each family. Various points of view not good enough, put forward to share with the square. This article mainly analyzes Huang Tingjian and Gao Yuanzhi’s different viewpoints on Tao Yuanming and Du Fu’s teaching poems and the unusual opinions on the poetry appraised by ancient teachers.