论文部分内容阅读
《华尔街日报》2007年初的变革,无论从哪个角度,都很容易被理解为2005年“小报化”的延续。当时,无数怀念报业黄金时代的读者和评论家猛烈抨击这份领袖报纸丧失了严肃保守的传统,精神上“沦陷”了。不过,或许正是有了“小报化”心理冲击垫底,评论家们对这次改版宽容多了。尽管著名评论网站slate上也有人用充满厌恶的口气批评说:改版之后的报纸丑得就像一条细长的毛巾;还有博客文章认为:作为深度报纸的楷模,《华尔街日报》瘦身是美国报业萎缩再恰当不过的隐喻。不过,有报道说:总体上看,读者对《华尔街日报》改版的评价是正面的。
The Wall Street Journal’s changes in early 2007, no matter from which perspective, can easily be understood as a continuation of the “mini-tabling” in 2005. At that time, countless readers and commentators who had missed the newspaper’s golden age lashed out at the leadership newspaper’s loss of a serious and conservative tradition, mentally “falling into place.” However, perhaps it is with “tabloidization ” psychological impact bottom, critics of the revision more tolerant. Despite the criticism on the slate of disagreeable comments on the famous commenting site slate, the ugly paper after the revision was like a slender towel; and the blog post said that as a model newspaper for the depth newspaper, The Wall Street Journal slimming is the American newspaper The industry is a more appropriate metaphor for shrinking. However, it is reported that: Overall, the reader’s assessment of the Wall Street Journal revision is positive.