由张维迎教授主持的北京大学改革方案刚一露面,即有巨大反响。这既符合北大的地位,也符合张维迎教授海归派经济学博士的身份。面对一些质疑诘责,张教授适时地在一些场合为其改革方案做了辩解(见7月10日《南方周末》载《北大激进变革》一文)。然而,张的解释却招致了更强烈的批评——“不仅在事实上和逻辑上都有问题,而且都是明显为不公平辩护”(见7月12日《南方都市报》马少华文《评为北大“辩护”的三点看 The reform program of Peking University, chaired by Professor Zhang Weiying, has just appeared and there is a tremendous response. This is in line with Peking University’s status, but also consistent with Professor Zhang Weiying returnees to send a doctor’s identity. In the face of some doubts and blame, Professor Zhang justified his reform program on some occasions in due course (see article on “radical changes at Peking University” in Southern Weekend on July 10). Zhang’s explanation, however, led to even more intense criticism - “not only in fact and in logic but also in the obvious defiance of unfairness” (see Ma Shaohua, Nanfang Dushi Bao, July 12, As Beijing University “defense” of the three point of view